The Missing Half of the Equation: Why Followership is the Ultimate Power Move

“Leadership sets direction. Followership creates momentum.”

Society's preoccupation with "Leadership" is readily apparent. We avidly consume narratives of groundbreaking CEOs, examine the daily routines of historical figures, and analyze the attributes of those in positions of power. From a young age, individuals are socialized to aspire to prominence, to become the person who possesses authority, the title, or the strategic vision.

This inclination is a core element of human behavior; we seek a straightforward route to success, often believing that by mirroring the actions of those we admire, we can attain our own accomplishments. Leadership is frequently perceived as the primary catalyst for progress, the singular role warranting cultivation.

Conversely, my recent reflections have undergone a shift. I have devoted considerable attention to an analysis of leadership models, particularly exploring the nuances of influence and the psychological foundations of authority. Then, a realization struck: the essential component of leadership is absent. We talk endlessly about the person at the top, but we are strangely silent about the persona of the "Follower," even though it is just as critical to the relationship as leadership itself. In the leader-follower dynamic, we are often very critical of the leadership but almost always ignore the follower’s responsibility.

The Anatomy of the Follower: Beyond the "Sheep"

To understand why followership is a professional superpower, we must look at the archetypes that define it. Experts identify that followers must have two basic characteristics to be effective: active behavior and critical thinking.

  • Effective Followers (The "Stars"): These are the individuals every organization thrives on. They are independent, critical thinkers who don't just take orders—they take initiative. They are well-focused, open to change, and courageous enough to navigate conflict or risk, regardless of how much power the person across from them holds.

  • Conformists (The "Yes-People"): These individuals exhibit high levels of energy but demonstrate a deficiency in critical analysis. These individuals are defined by their active involvement and participation; however, they do not challenge directives. While they offer unwavering support to their superiors, their failure to provide critical feedback can potentially lead a leader into a state of unawareness.

  • Passive Followers (The "Sheep"): These followers contribute to a deficiency in initiative. They require constant micromanagement, fail to generate enthusiasm, and often, albeit unintentionally, foster a culture of blame and excessive control due to their reluctance to accept accountability for their assigned responsibilities.

  • Alienated Followers: This group represents a distinct category. They are intelligent, competent individuals who perceive themselves as disregarded in the pursuit of advancement. Their resentment can fester, and they might use their smarts to undermine the team's spirit or act negatively due to feeling sidelined.

  • Pragmatic Survivors: The chameleons of the workplace. They shift their behavior to suit the situation. While they are survivors, they are often the first to anticipate change—and the first to assume it will be for the worst.

The Art of Managing Up, Down, and Sideways

The most fascinating aspect of followership is that it isn't just for those at the "bottom." In fact, it is the defining challenge of mid-level management. These managers must behave as leaders and followers at the same time, necessitating a unique skill set to handle different directions of influence.

  • Managing Up: This requires behaving as an effective follower. It means possessing the right knowledge and attitude to support senior management while exhibiting active behaviors and critical thinking.

  • Managing Down: This is about building a following. It means being receptive to input and fostering a space where everyone can contribute. It's about empowering those beneath you to think for themselves and helping "sheep" find their voice.

  • Managing Sideways: This is often overlooked, but it's crucial for teamwork. It's about forging solid, peer-to-peer bonds with colleagues, extending the same courtesy and focus you'd offer a supervisor or someone who reports directly to you.

Putting the Framework into Practice: A Growth Mindset

To truly embody these behaviors, we can draw on Bloom's Taxonomy. It's usually a tool for educators, but it works surprisingly well here. Seeing followership through this framework shows a way to get really good at it:

  • Knowledge & Comprehension: Remembering the right ways to do things in different situations and making sure plans aren't just heard, but understood through effective communication.

  • Application & Analysis: Employing our skills to tackle problems as they arise and maintaining a critical perspective when assessing decisions. It's about using our knowledge in unfamiliar circumstances.

  • Synthesis & Evaluation: Uniting diverse team members into a cohesive unit and consistently evaluating our performance—not just the "what" of our actions, but the "how" of our execution.

Closing Thoughts

In the end, while leadership often gets the attention, it's followership that actually makes things happen. Whether you are leading a department or supporting a project, your ability to think critically and act actively is what determines the success of the collective. Leadership and followership are two sides of the same coin; one cannot succeed without the mastery of the other.

Next time you evaluate a project’s success, don’t just look at the vision from the top—look at the strength, responsibility, and critical thinking of the people who brought that vision to life.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Stop Managing Tasks, Start Serving People: The Leadership Fix for a Failing Corporate Culture

When Luxury Met Humility: The Curious Rolls-Royce Tale of a Princely Domain

The Imperative of Servant Leadership: Building Cultures of Growth, Not Control