What I Learned Studying Small Coffee Shops Against Global Giants

"Behind every coffee counter lies a series of deliberate business decisions."

Here's something I've figured out over the years writing about business: you don't really get how companies work until you put two of them side by side and watch what happens. Textbooks are fine, but they don't show you the messy reality.

So I decided to spend some serious time looking at coffee businesses in Milan. Small local shops versus the big international chains. I thought I knew what I'd find, but the actual research? It turned everything I expected upside down.

Milan's Coffee Scene: A Perfect Test Case

Why Milan? Because the whole situation there was almost too perfect. You've got this city where coffee isn't just something people drink—it's woven into the fabric of daily life. Espresso bars on every corner. Traditions going back generations.

Then in 2017, Orsonero Coffee opens up. Small operation, specialty focus, founded by someone who'd moved from Canada with a vision for quality coffee. They're doing their thing, building a local following.

A year later, Starbucks walks in. Not just any Starbucks location—we're talking about the company's first store in Italy after almost fifty years of global expansion. Think about the audacity of that. Starbucks literally built its reputation by copying Italian coffee culture and selling it to Americans. Now they're bringing that copy back to Italy and saying "here, try this."

I couldn't have designed a better comparison if I'd tried.

How They Approached the Same Market Differently

Orsonero kept things focused on what locals wanted. Market-oriented is the fancy term, but really they just paid attention. What do people in Milan expect from their coffee? What would make them come back every morning? The founders weren't trying to reinvent anything. They took Italian coffee culture seriously and aimed to do it exceptionally well.

Starbucks? Completely different playbook. They came in with resources Orsonero couldn't dream of and built something that didn't exist in Milan before. A 25,000 square foot space. Think about that for a second—most coffee shops in Milan are tiny. Starbucks created what they called a Reserve Roastery, which is less about coffee and more about creating an experience you can't get anywhere else.

One company perfected the familiar. The other made the familiar feel small by comparison.

Where It Gets Interesting: The Details

Looking at the seven Ps of marketing showed where theory became reality.

Products: Orsonero's menu fits on a small chalkboard. Espresso, cappuccino, flat white, filter coffee, some pastries. Everything they offer, they do really well. Starbucks showed up with 115 products. The menu itself was a statement.

Pricing: Orsonero charges €1.20 for espresso when competitors charge €1. Why the extra twenty cents? Quality beans cost more, and going cheaper meant serving inferior coffee. But €1.50 or €2 would price them out entirely. That twenty-cent difference represents hours of strategic thinking.

Starbucks charges €1.80 for espresso, roughly double for specialty drinks. But they're selling the whole Reserve Roastery experience, not just coffee.

Promotion: Orsonero runs good social media and builds reputation through quality. Starbucks deployed full campaigns—social, media coverage, global brand recognition. Their opening generated news worth millions.

Location: Orsonero set up fifteen minutes from the main station, opening 8am to 5pm weekdays, shorter on weekends. Starbucks grabbed a central historic building and runs 7am to 10pm daily. Different strategies, different economics.

What I Took Away

Spending weeks on this research changed how I think about competition.

Both can win. Orsonero isn't losing because Starbucks exists. They attract different customers, meet different needs. Some people want their neighborhood spot where the barista knows their order. Others want the spectacle and novelty. Same product, different value propositions.

That twenty-cent pricing difference keeps sticking with me. It represented the actual cost of quality without losing competitiveness. Competitive pricing isn't matching the other guy—it's knowing exactly where you fit and why.

Scale changes everything. Starbucks runs fifteen-hour days because their systems and volume support it. Orsonero's shorter hours make sense for their economics. Neither's wrong—just optimized differently.

They're even measuring success differently. Orsonero might consider three or four quality locations across Italy a huge win. Starbucks needs market penetration and brand establishment. Same city, totally different finish lines.

Why This Research Mattered to Me

You can read business strategy textbooks until your eyes glaze over. Market orientation versus resource-based strategy. The seven Ps. Porter's competitive forces. All useful frameworks, sure. But watching two real companies use these concepts in the same market? That's when everything clicked for me.

Every choice these businesses made—what to charge, how many products to offer, where to locate, when to open—came from constraints and capabilities that were completely different. Orsonero had to be precise, almost surgical, with every decision. Limited resources mean limited room for error. Starbucks could afford to be expansive, to try things, to absorb mistakes that would sink a smaller operation.

Neither approach guarantees success. Both can fail spectacularly. What matters is alignment—does your strategy actually match your resources, your position, what your customers need?

Milan's coffee scene keeps evolving. Maybe Orsonero adds delivery service or opens a second location. Maybe Starbucks introduces more Italian-specific offerings, trying to feel less foreign. Both will adapt, both will keep making strategic choices based on who they are and what they can realistically do.

But the lesson I'm taking forward goes beyond coffee shops. There's no single "right way" to compete in business. There's only finding the right way for your specific situation. That's what makes this kind of research worthwhile for me—picking apart real companies, real decisions, real consequences. Every comparison teaches me something new about how business actually works, not how textbooks say it should work.

And that's exactly why I'll keep doing this.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Imperative of Servant Leadership: Building Cultures of Growth, Not Control

Image
Leadership begins with lifting others. In my professional journey, I’ve always been a fervent advocate for Servant Leadership . This philosophy, where the leader’s primary goal is to serve their colleagues, empower them, and help them grow , is, to me, the ideal path to organizational success. Yet, my practical experience in many workplaces has presented a stark reality: I’ve often seen leadership fail to deliver on this promise . Instead of genuine support and growth enablement, the focus has consistently been on controlling behavior . The only sustainable solution for business entities to thrive and help their teams reach their full potential is to completely embed Servant Leadership into their organizational culture . Shifting the Paradigm: From Authority to Service Servant Leadership is not a soft skill; it is a strategic operating model that fundamentally changes the leader-follower relationship. It moves from the traditional power hierarchy to a model of partnership , prioritizi...
Read more

Stop Managing Tasks, Start Serving People: The Leadership Fix for a Failing Corporate Culture

Image
“From bottlenecks to breakthroughs in people management.” I've worked in the corporate world for years, and I’ve personally experienced the frustrating reality of constant, poorly managed change . Every new project or restructuring made things even more confusing and tiring. We talk a lot about "innovation" and "change management," but when it comes time to put those ideas into action, it often seems like the system is set up to fail the people it’s supposed to help. Why do so many smart people get burned out or lose interest? Why does every attempt to change feel like pulling teeth? From my own experiences, the advice of many coworkers, and a lot of research, I have come to a clear conclusion: corporate management often fails because it doesn't understand what it means to lead people. The HR Issue: More About Rules Than Culture First, let's really look at Human Resources. In too many businesses, the HR department is now just a clerical job . They keep t...
Read more

When Luxury Met Humility: The Curious Rolls-Royce Tale of a Princely Domain

Image
The Enduring Power of a Viral Myth, and the Priceless Lesson It Teaches Us About Fact vs. Fiction. “A myth retold across nations — the Rolls-Royce legend of pride, punishment, and truth.” In the summer of 2016—during my years in the   UAE   (2012–2018)—I was on my usual evening crawl from   Dubai   to   Sharjah . Anyone who has lived in the Emirates, especially as a South Asian commuter, knows this routine well: inching through traffic, crossing junctions at a snail’s pace, and often spending more than 1½ hours behind the wheel. That evening, with the radio playing in the background, an Indian RJ shared a story so vivid, humorous, and strangely thought-provoking that it stayed with me long after the traffic cleared. A Royal Walk on Bond Street The tale opened in the 1920s. The  Muqarram Jah ,  Nizam of Hyderabad —normally dressed in royal attire—was strolling casually along London’s  Bond Street . He paused outside the  Rolls-Royce ...
Read more